Vomelche wrote:
Good article. This is probably the biggest difference in point of view between our generation and the previous. Where previously over achievement / go getter attitude was highly valued and encouraged, today it just doesn't work, at the end common sense prevails.
I've read a similar argument as presented in this article. On Winston Wu's Happier Abroad website, can't find the link to it atm.
Anyway, I was raised with the "oldschool" mindset, either that or I gleaned it somehow from watching too much old media as a kid or something. Either way, I have such oldschool mentality.
I'm of the opinion high self esteem doesn't lead to results. Take any sport. You can't be like "Yeah man, I'm the best because I am" and expect to do good in a sport. Even if naturally gifted, without drive or determination it's irrelevant. It's this way with anything in life.
My friend describes this scenario. He works at Pizza Hut. People brag about how they're the best dough flippers or whatever, without any real basis. Meanwhile he doesn't brag about such things and people marvel at him when he makes some pizza combination or something nobody ever thought of before. One has high self esteem and accomplishes nothing, the other doesn't and accomplishes something.
George Bernard Shaw wrote:
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are
always so sure of themselves, and wiser people are full of
doubts”
This is the problem presented of self esteem. It's like living in the Matrix if you will. On one end, you can have people with high self esteem that don't accomplish anything and have no skills. On the other, geniuses too unsure of themselves to show anything to the world or act on their ideas. So some middle ground must be found, humility probably being the better place to lean towards. But Shaw's quote is true, generally the people with high self esteem should not have it, and generally the people with low should.