mouthyb wrote:
I'm a little taller than that (okay, almost half a foot), but I like 'em tall on occasion (not always.) It allows me to make awful jokes about scaling them and planting a flag on their heads.
And, you know, there are some things which are fun to do in bed and require the guy to be bigger/stronger than you....
I think it depends on the guy in that case. I think we can safely assume on average the bigger the guy, the more likely he is to be stronger, but bigger doesn't automatically mean stronger.
There are plenty of short guys who are stronger than their taller friends.
I do know what you guys speak of in terms of the sexual antics in the bedroom. I did enjoy being with the 4'10 in that regard, but everything else she was just too small for me. I could do all the same things I did with her with a woman who had 5 inches on her... Hell I could probably do the same things to a woman of any height.. Her weight would be more of the deciding factor.
I only mention the bigger/stronger part because as a junior/senior in High school I was 5'5 and a half, weighed about 135-140 and could lift 365 pounds (deadlift weight), 6'0+ friends could not lift this weight. Now of course with rigorous training they eventually could, no doubt, I'm sure lift that amount.
I guess my reason for bringing it up was it depends on the individual guy. So you say that you don't want a shorter guy because of the sexual component.. Well that is negated by being with a short strong guy. Now if the sexual component requires him to be larger in size (lol, strictly speaking the body other than that one part), then I can see how that would be a thing.