naturalplastic wrote:
ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
A lot of people have a "shoot first and ask questions later attitude." By that, I mean that if they can't put their finger on the meaning behind what someone said or did, they feel it's their God-given right to assume the worst and lash out. Most NTs get offended when they're not 100% sure they understand the meaning in something someone said or did. It's what they default to. Rather than pause and reflect, or at least give the benefit of the doubt, most will assume ill intention.
That's standard NT behavior when someone doesn't act according to the social script.
you're saying that I have the right to be obtuse and unthinking in what I say. But others dont have the right to be obtuse and unthinking in their reactions to what I say. I dont have to "be reflective" before I speak. But others have to be reflective before reacting to me.
You gotta admit that that double standard makes no sense.
No, naturalplastic, that's not what I'm saying at all. If you don't understand, ask for clarification before making absurd inferences.
What I'm saying is that it's irrelevant how thinking/unthinking you are. You could rack your brain trying to "get it right" before opening your mouth, but if you still don't deliver "properly," then people will default to 'being offended.' That's the thought pattern, "I don't get it, therefore, it's offensive!" regardless of how thinking/unthinking you are in your delivery. That's the point I was making, which you totally spun in some bizarre direction.
Ironically, you kind of prove my point to some extent. You misunderstood me and were quick to try and debase me. Do you see a little more clearly now? Does it make a little more sense?