BlankReg wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I can digitally restore old and worn recordings to something more approximate of what they might have sounded like brand new, but record collectors are a strange bunch per se, because they LIKE to hear their old records with all the hisses and scratches and distortion, to them that is "music" to their ears and my services are most assuredly unwelcome at any price.

I do that too and have had the same reaction. Interestingly I just read a book on the history of recording called "Perfecting Sound Forever," and apparently the argument over what constitutes a "pure" recording goes back to Edison, who thought it meant the sound of the performance and nothing else, and Victor records who thought that "pure" meant capturing the performance space (ambience, reverberations, etc.).
But scratches and pops? No. Don't miss them. However, there is one sound that might have a positive effect. If you put a perfectly clean vinyl disc on a perfectly balanced turntable, you will still hear a slight hiss-- like pink noise. And that background feathers everything else on the record. even though it has no basis in the reality of the musical performance, this noise is what I and many engineers believe is the softening element that many people who prefer vinyl are subconsciously reacting to.
I guess some of us are more sensitive to sounds than others- what sounds like a soft hiss to some sounds to me like a cacophony. I hear in such-
*high treble hiss
*upper midrange rushing
*lower midrange groove wall roar
*up to 300 cycles or so I hear rumble from disc bearings and subtle low-frequency variations in the vinyl surface.
typical phonographic crackle though, tends to overwhelm those other noises which only become apparent after CEDAR processing.