0_equals_true wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
The previous Pope, Ratzinger, was a bit Sheldon-Leonard-like in personality. Makes you wonder.
Is amazing how people speculate on s**t.
He was religious conservative. Just becuase he wasn't enigmatic doesn't make him autistic. Most people aren't.
Beside a Sheldon would find that doctrine illogical.
I was being just a tad tongue-in-cheek. And I wasnt impugning his conservatism.
Wasn't "enigmatic"??????????????
WTF?
"Enigmatic" means "mysterious".
I think that you mean "wasn't charismatic".
He was lacking in charisma. But he was also very pedantic. And not a "people person". Rather stiff.
I guess my point was that if a dork like Ratzinger (aspie or not) can rise to being the chairman of the board of the biggest religious institution on the planet than there is more than enough hope for the OP in the clergy business.
And you have to admit that Ratzinger was more outwardly aspie acting than many historic figures whom folks on WP commonly latch onto as possible aspies (Jefferson, Lincoln, Reagan).
But I agree that you cant 'armchair diagnose somebody'. They have to undergo the exhaustive diagnosis process conducted by a qualified expert. I did forget to chant that WP catechism when I said that.