1401b wrote:
Hey, 4% to the end user's not bad! ...
That means "...
one for you, and twenty-four for me ... one for you, and twenty-four for me ... one for you, and twenty-four for me ...", ad infinitum. No surprise that this makes certain "charitable" organizations look like money-grubbing exploiters of other people's misery.
I remember that about 20 years ago, it was revealed that 17% is the aggregate mean percentage of end-user shares for all charities listed under the United Way banner, and THAT means "... one for you, and five for me ... one for you, and five for me ... one for you, and five for me ...", ad infinitum.
Autism Speaks Does NOT Speak For Me!