Fnord wrote:
Okay, so I come on a little strong with my Biblical understanding; just like an evangelist who is determined to prove that everybody is a sinner and going straight to Hell when they die.
But what of it? All I'm doing is sharing what I've learned from the Bible, and using valid Biblical references to support my findings - same Bible, different conclusions. I'm not trying to change their beliefs, just add to them.
It's like when I present a fact-based argument against what someone has posted in WP - because they can not refute the facts or dispute the reasoning, they resort to personal attacks against me.
That's when I know that I'm right.
The Bible is an interesting document, including stories about murder, incest, theft, lies, slavery, fraud, perjury, torture ... Yet Christians seem to have some form of selective blindness when it comes to those parts of the Bible. They seem to act as if those parts don't matter, and that anyone who knows about them - especially those of us who speak of them - are blasphemous creatures undeserving of love and mercy.
And THAT is why I don't have many Christian friends.
The question here is, do they
ask to hear these things from you? Who truly is benefiting from your decision to "add to their beliefs", because the way you describe it, it sounds like you're only doing it purely out of your own self-interest. Your direct comparison to overbearing evangelists hits the nail on the head; I just don't see why you would use overbearing Christians as a justification for aggressive atheism, and much less so why someone such as yourself would even be in seemingly regular company with conservative Christians to begin with.
I have close friends who are radical atheists - we're talking people who even wear t-shirts which read "Wash Hands After Handling Christians" - and I've seen them make their dislike and mockery of Abrahamic religions well-known online but I've still seen them interact civilly with Christians and Jews (and vice versa) because they're still decent human beings who can have conversations which don't center around deconstructing or disseminating each others' belief systems. And even when we debate matters of theology, we still remain
friends because our relationship is founded on a multitude of other factors. An ontological discussion between my atheist friends is really no more heated than arguing over movies...although, to be fair, I
am a flaming liberal who's studied theology and comparative religion for several years, so it's not like I'm an uneducated, gun-hugging Fox News viewer (which is likely why I seem to always argue with other Christians more than I ever do atheists).
The point is, regardless of anyone's spiritual affiliation or lack thereof, I still follow the Golden Rule: don't be a dick. I stand firmly by my own beliefs and I'm not shy about defending them, and I respect other peoples' rights to do the same. What works for them is what works for them. If we can still maintain a friendship or professional relationship in spite of those differences, then awesome, but if it's a big enough deal to drive a wedge between us, then our friendship likely wasn't strong enough to begin with. Those are my thoughts on the matter.