I am pansexual, so non-heterosexual. Also aromantic, though that's something different
Fnord wrote:
This method lays out attraction, gender identity, and sex of an individual.
There are four "attractions".
Androtropic - Attracted to males.
Ambitropic - Attracted to males and females (formerly "Bixexual")
Atropic - Not attracted to either sex (formerly "Asexual")
Gynotropic - Attracted to females.
"Cis-" and "Trans-" are modifiers for gender identity.
"Female" and "Male" are the two sexes.
A "Gynotropic Cis-Male" is a person who was born male, identifies as a man, and is attracted to women.
A "Gynotropic Trans-Male" is a person was born female, identifies as male, and is attracted to women.
I'm trying to get this terminology widely accepted to avoid confusion between all of the different gender definitions people label themselves with.
Three terms should be enough.
My issues with this way of labeling include:
1) There are more than two sexes. There are many forms of intersex.
2) There is nothing for nonbinary people in either the gender or attraction categories.
3) The attractions seem to be based on sex, not gendersexual, even though you cannot usually tell sex when you're first attracted to someone sexually. Sexual attraction is usually based off on gender expression.