carthago wrote:
Glassdoor is one of the most accurate websites out there for this kind of information. It's the Wikipedia of the working world. Be that as it may, companies change over time, sometimes faster than the reviews and salary information can keep up with.
I have talked to others at my company about salary. One was hired at my level for $25k less and another for $8k more than the Glassdoor average. Clearly, you shouldn't rely on Glassdoor for senior and managerial positions, but it is accurate for entry level posts, where salaries are standardized.
That's a good point. In my bottom level but still management position I saw all the salary levels and what it was possible to make in the different titles. So let's say you have a Junior Worker, Worker, Senior Worker, and Lead Worker in the Worker Department. Most people will be hired as a Worker, at 35,000, the base for that level. Base for Senior Worker was something like 46,000. So the range for Worker is 35,000-45,999. The only reason you would hire a "Junior Worker" is to justify paying them less or hiring a person with no degree. The range would be something like 25,000-34,999. The Lead position would be between Worker and Senior. So like 38,000-55,000. The Senior position would be between 46,000-57,000. The reason it would go higher than the Lead position is because managers typically get bonuses.
In another department, say, Laborer, the ranges do not have the Junior level and are 1.5x higher, although the employees are less educated and work fewer hours.
I made up all those numbers. I just wanted to show that ranges in job titles usually are not even and are often there to justify hiring a particular person who would typically be over- or underqualified. Sometimes the person was way worth it and sometimes we had a bad egg.