I really, really hate MSDOS batch files. I had to try to use them after I was used to writing shell scripts for various other OSes. The MSDOS stuff was so pathetic. They stole ideas from CP/M, didn't implement them properly, eventually upgraded it all to look a bit more like Unix, but didn't get that right either. Awful.
Then there was QBASIC. Lovely. A freebie programming language. Not perfect, but pretty good. And somewhere down the line, MS stopped supplying it. I used to copy the .exe file around with me onto the versions of Windows that had dropped it (was it dropped before or after W95?).
TheMachine1 wrote:
ahayes wrote:
Kcihtred2 wrote:
DOS is awsome!! ! but it sucks... i much rather have something run off of hexidecimal than binary
There isn't a computer in existence that runs off hex, it's all binary. Hex is just a convenient representation of binary data.
True processing is binary but I think memory chips still use hex based storage because it uses fewer transistors and it merely decodes/encodes at its interface.
Afraid not. HexAdecimal has no place at all down at the hardware level.
There is an argument that implies that a ternary system is marginally more efficient, and some hardware was even built, in Russia. It never caught on.
The only thing you'll run into is tristate, but that doesn't mean what it sounds like. I.e. it's not having three values per digit, it's having the binary 0 and 1, plus "I don't know/care".
_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports."
Kamran Nazeer