Board index › General Discussion › General Autism Discussion

Autistic MIT student invents device for autistics

Page 1 of 1 [ 9 posts ] 

Previous topic | Next topic

mikewhateverm
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Age: 68
Posts: 29

26 May 2016, 11:33 am

https://news.stanford.edu/thedish/2016/ ... ent-prize/

He must be autistic because he is smart



skibum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2013
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,376
Location: my own little world

26 May 2016, 2:28 pm

That is very cool. Thank you for posting that.


_________________
"I'm bad and that's good. I'll never be good and that's not bad. There's no one I'd rather be than me."

Wreck It Ralph


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,941
Location: Long Island, New York

26 May 2016, 5:12 pm

Trying to make autistics indistinguable from thier peers yet again.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

26 May 2016, 5:15 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Trying to make autistics indistinguable from thier peers yet again.

Mmm-hm.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,777
Location: USA

26 May 2016, 8:21 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Trying to make autistics indistinguable from thier peers yet again.


HOW? The are going to be MORE distinguishable from their peers once they are wearing funny glasses. And what's bad about recognizing people's emotions?


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html


AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

26 May 2016, 8:35 pm

Ganondox wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Trying to make autistics indistinguable from thier peers yet again.

HOW? The are going to be MORE distinguishable from their peers once they are wearing funny glasses. And what's bad about recognizing people's emotions?

To explain the difference, let me suggest that the same invention should have been recommended for use by non-autistic individuals to help them better understand autists. But, even that suggestion fails to support the fact that everyone is different and needs no correction of their lives.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,777
Location: USA

27 May 2016, 10:20 pm

AspieUtah wrote:
Ganondox wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Trying to make autistics indistinguable from thier peers yet again.

HOW? The are going to be MORE distinguishable from their peers once they are wearing funny glasses. And what's bad about recognizing people's emotions?

To explain the difference, let me suggest that the same invention should have been recommended for use by non-autistic individuals to help them better understand autists. But, even that suggestion fails to support the fact that everyone is different and needs no correction of their lives.


Let's put it this way: do you think corrective glasses for eyesight are bad just because everyone is different and some people can't see as far away?


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html


AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

28 May 2016, 7:19 am

Ganondox wrote:
AspieUtah wrote:
Ganondox wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Trying to make autistics indistinguable from thier peers yet again.

HOW? The are going to be MORE distinguishable from their peers once they are wearing funny glasses. And what's bad about recognizing people's emotions?

To explain the difference, let me suggest that the same invention should have been recommended for use by non-autistic individuals to help them better understand autists. But, even that suggestion fails to support the fact that everyone is different and needs no correction of their lives.

Let's put it this way: do you think corrective glasses for eyesight are bad just because everyone is different and some people can't see as far away?

Of course not. I actually believe that each individual has the right to choose using whatever benefits them so long as it is harmful to them or others. But, it seemed to me that the news report and glasses' inventor are presuming that autistic individuals should use the glasses because it will help them be less autistic not because the glasses are simply helpful overall. Now, again, that is a choice for each autistic individual to make, but I like being autistic (many do), and find ways to enjoy my impairments somewhat. So, I would probably decline using the glasses because I don't believe that I need its help.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,777
Location: USA

28 May 2016, 3:14 pm

AspieUtah wrote:
Ganondox wrote:
AspieUtah wrote:
Ganondox wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Trying to make autistics indistinguable from thier peers yet again.

HOW? The are going to be MORE distinguishable from their peers once they are wearing funny glasses. And what's bad about recognizing people's emotions?

To explain the difference, let me suggest that the same invention should have been recommended for use by non-autistic individuals to help them better understand autists. But, even that suggestion fails to support the fact that everyone is different and needs no correction of their lives.

Let's put it this way: do you think corrective glasses for eyesight are bad just because everyone is different and some people can't see as far away?

Of course not. I actually believe that each individual has the right to choose using whatever benefits them so long as it is harmful to them or others. But, it seemed to me that the news report and glasses' inventor are presuming that autistic individuals should use the glasses because it will help them be less autistic not because the glasses are simply helpful overall. Now, again, that is a choice for each autistic individual to make, but I like being autistic (many do), and find ways to enjoy my impairments somewhat. So, I would probably decline using the glasses because I don't believe that I need its help.

Where you getting the impression that "glasses' inventor are presuming that autistic individuals should use the glasses because it will help them be less autistic "? Also, these glasses aren't going to make anyone not autistic, it's just supposed to assist in reading faces. How is it bad to people to read facial expressions?


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html