techstepgenr8tion wrote:
I hate to say it but I'm not sure it's a helpful question.
The better vs. worse takes two only partially desirable situations and perhaps tries to compare their strengths and weaknesses but even there there's a whole other set of factors. For instance what about the less intelligent but kind person by luck a policy that's really on-point where as the intelligent and kind person has a pet-distortion that pulls them toward defending some kind of falsehood they believe in? The later happens all the time. You could similarly have the person whose intelligent but perhaps narcissistic applying their intelligence to save lives, they're just not the person you'd want to talk to at a holiday party because you might either get smugly brushed off or hear for hours about their golf game. The intelligent but kind person might be a top-flight ER doctor, the kind and intelligent person could be a Marxist professor, and the dumb but kind person may still have a knack for spotting competant people and digesting their ideas in a bite-sized manner.
Too many variables and I don't know that we are or ever will be up against such an either/or choice as that.
I'll give context. I'm frustrated with my roomates because they're stupid. Everyone is so freaking stupid. I'd rather have smart roomates.
Drake wrote:
It's got to be intelligence overwhelmingly. We could be super kind to each other, but we'd be little better off than a pack of wolves without the intelligence that has advanced our species, the way that has made our lives easier overwhelmingly outweighs any amount of being nice to each other.
Let's assume that the kind but dumb person is of more or less average intelligence, and the intelligent but mean person has more or less average empathic capacities. Both are important for the progression of the human race. Would intelligence still be more important in that context?