Jacoby wrote:
All news sources should be taken with a grain of salt, they are all untrustworthy and agenda driven on some level which is why you need an aggregate of difference sources. Don't put any trust in these people, they should have to demonstrate their trustworthiness and are non entitled to anything. You have to read it with that context in mind, any other way is just you being indoctrinated. Is there any bigger joke these silver spooned Chris Cuomo on CNN likened being called 'fake news' was for a journalist akin to being called the 'n-word'. My go to sites for news are Drudge and RealClearPolitics which are news aggregates with stories and articles from many different sources including those considered on the far left. RCP is funny because if you read there daily roundup of whatever there is usually some huge partisan declaration follow by one that says the complete opposite. If you only get news from Facebook, cable or network TV, or the dying newspaper industry like the NYT or Washington Post. You need lots of different sources, there are like only 5 or 6 huge corporations that control all the media in the US.
It's good to reevaluate your beliefs sometimes especially when the actions of people you thought you supported (communists/anarchists) have exposed themselves for what they really are. You have to ask what type of future do you want, I don't think anybody can say it has been trending better and it's been that way my whole life. Who have been the ones that have oppressed you? Another thing you have to start taking in the zero sum nature of government services, you might say you're a liberal now but would you stay liberal if you had to share what little money you do get with people who came to this country illegally? Old school unions opposed illegal immigration, Caeser Chavez actually led the first Minuteman militias on the border to stop illegals who were in his eyes scab workers against his UFW union.
The big money internationalists now are firmly in control of the Democratic party which is why they are abandoning their tradition bases, I don't see how anybody could support that party
Frankly, the only media sites I fully trust are the BBC World Service, Radio Canada International, the ABC (Australia Broadcasting Corporation), Deutsche Welle, and, half-heartedly, The Christian Science Monitor.)
Quite frankly, there is now no difference between the Dopeycrats (unless said dopeycrat is a basset hound
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
) and the reThuglicans. That was more than evident during Sick Willie Clit-toungues presidency. He and Billery were Dopeycrats in name only. The sided with the reThuglicans more often.