Aniihya wrote:
Well I tend to come from a rather "post-gender" environment. My circle of friends and acquintances, rarely or never really care about their own gender identities, even though many do express themselves as male or female in appearance. But generally t-shirt and jeans is like the most gender neutral clothing out there. It has manifested itself as popular among men and women mostly of younger generations.
But mostly I have seen people who use cishet (cis-hetero) in a very negative and hateful context.
As a quaker I believe in reconciliation and not hate. But whoever believe you must adopt a worldview to reconcile, does not believe in reconciliation but prefers assimilation, which is wrong.
I've had conversations where cishet is simply a descriptor. An easy way to describe folx who are not part of a GSM (Gender and Sexual Minorities). I look at the word as similar to my use of Allistic or Allosexual. Do you see those terms also relating to personality types that you find toxic? (genuine question, not sarcasm). Although now that I think about it you did say that it's the type of people who would say the word, and not necessarily the use of the word that's toxic so maybe it doesn't correlate. "Amatonormativity" might be a better comparison.
I didn't know that quakers were still a thing. That's cool that there seems to be a preference for peaceful resolution (based on 20 seconds of reading). I like that ♥ I am not sure that I understand the details of reconciliation vs assimilation but maybe I'll understand more if I do some reading.
_________________
Very high systematizing, low empathy, but moderate to high sympathy.
I do not experience cognitive dissonance reduction the way that other people do.
Professionally diagnosed in March 2018