Fnord wrote:
Deltaville wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Deltaville wrote:
The article doesn't prove s**t. It's only an isolated case study.
Please submit your own research paper, or a working link thereto, for our own review and study. You are a fully-qualified virologist, are you not?I'm a physicist.
Ahh ... Argument from False Authority ... got it!Deltaville wrote:
Look at the article carefully. They don't hold realistic control variables and much of the content is conjectural.
I have read this and many other articles on the subject, most of which are admittedly better-written that the ONE article that has ruined your day, and all have supported the same claim: Wearing a face mask properly strongly reduces your chances of contracting the coronavirus.
But if there is a valid research paper that can successfully support the null hypothesis, I would like to read it.
Got any?You asked for my occupation and I answered it.
Even the paper concludes that study has some serious limitations in contrast to an experimental setting. And besides, if a mask is a piece of fabric, viral elements can easily permeate. Use your common sense.
_________________
Sebastian
"Don't forget to floss." - Darkwing Duck