What someone has said about abortion on another forum.
What do you think about this? This is what someone has said about abortion on another forum.
Moreover, to say abortion is wrong except in cases where the woman might die is such bullcrap. The only reason anyone would think woman should not have abortion except when that she might die is because limiting access to abortion is ultimately about controlling the woman. That's the position of someone who thinks women need to be punished for being sexual persons, as nature made us, and for having sex, as is natural and normal. We hear the same nonsense with the case of rape. But since you didn't make that exception, I'm going to assume you're a classy dude who thinks women who are raped should be punished for it (because we all know rape is the victim's fault and not the rapist's).
But either way, if you make one exception for abortion than really, you're saying the medical procedure of abortion itself is OK. It's just you don't think women ourselves actually have the right to choose an abortion,and thus iltimately be able to make choices about our own lives and health. We need Very Moral Men like you to decide when it might be OK for us to have an abortion--like if we might die. How gracious of you! Buuuuuut giving that ANY pregnancy can be life-treatening because pregnancy is inherently a risky biological event, I wonder where we are suppose to draw the line? Any OB-Gyn will tell you you can't actually know when a woman "might die" from a pregancy until she actually has died, and then,whoops, it's a little too late your crusading moralizing! What a pickle!
In addition to the reality-defiant absurdity of all of this, your postion exposes how your baseline thinking towards women is that we're sluts and whores, and only a few of us can possibly be exempt from your judgement. Nevermind that the majority of women who seek abortions are already mothers with families and want an abortion because they cannot afford another child for one reason or another. Those whores!
But facts--eh. They mess with our BELIEFS. And we love believing women deserve to be controlled and punished, because we're such damned sluts. Nevermind if forcing women to carry an unwanted or unplanned pregnancy:
--keeps them and their children in poverty, or will force them into poverty
--forces them (and any children they may have) to stay with an abusive partner
--swamps them with medical bills for themselves or their child that are financially overwhelming
--costs them a job or an education which in turn limits their future ability to earn an income to support themselves and that child
--or if their pregnancy complicates a pre-existing health problem, like heart disease or depression, compromises their long-term health and ability to raise that child
Why should we let logic, facts, common decency and compassion over those very real issues that compel women to seek an abortion get in the way of our sanctimonous belief that women are just whores who need to be kept in their place? Why should we let women have any control over their bodies, their life choices and ultimately their quality of life and the quality of life of any child they may have? No. Can't have that. Too reasonable. Too compassionate. Too civilized. And that would be too much like treating women like they are human beings. The horror.
Look, let's get real: abortion has been a part of human culture as long as there has been human culture, because women, like or it not, have always made choices about when they should and should not be pregnant (actually a very common phenomenon in many species). For ages, we have trusted women to make this choice. It's only in recent centuries, thanks largely to patriarchial religions like Christianity, that society has stopped trusting women to make these choices about pregnancy and child-bearing that we have evolved to make. Yeah, that's why nature gave us the uterus and not you dudes. Sorry, but it's time to start trusting women again. Deal with it.
CockneyRebel
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20abc/20abcc3bf020613b8ffbf251fe81e1fd64b453b5" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,530
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love
I'm very staunchly Pro-Life and I feel that every human life is worth living. God should decide who's to live and who's to die.
_________________
The Family Enigma
Last edited by CockneyRebel on 30 Jan 2021, 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I agree with it. I know most of the anti abortion stuff is misogyny because the responsibility is never put on the guy and no one ever argues they also need to keep their legs closed. The blame is always put on the woman.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a66d/8a66d21872cf8415046fcac62c3c4f85de9d79dd" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,995
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I mostly agree, not sure I would word it all the same she did. But for sure pregnancy is inherently risky and it should be the person who's pregnant who decides what happens. One of my sisters friends even had a perfectly fine pregnancy like everything seemed fine until she was having the baby and some things came up, luckily it turned out ok and she was able to have the baby and was fine and the baby was fine. But it got close to them having to choose her or the baby and they kind of agreed they'd rather the baby not survive than the baby survive and her dying. So yeah not trying to be disturbing but complications cannot always be predicted, and I would not discourage someone who wants a baby from getting pregnant but it should be their choice where they have consented to the potential risks.
I don't want a kid and I don't think I could take care of one, but also the pregnancy complications aren't really something I want to risk and I do have a sort of muscle condition of some sort that is not fully understood so that could bring up some other risks as well, but the doctors who found that don't even know what all effects it would have if any but they aren't certain it wouldn't affect a pregnancy if I got pregnant. But that is why I think it needs to be a personal choice because everyone is different and some people may even have health factors that could make pregnancy more dangerous so no one should be forced. But like sure I mentioned reasons why I wouldn't want to go through with it, but the reality is people shouldn't have to justify their choice not to have a baby or take a pregnancy to term.
_________________
We won't go back.
Bollocks.
It's fine if you're pro-choice, but not like this. This is the short-sighted toxic kind.
Assuming that the only point of pro-life is to control women and that's bollocks.
Pro-life is based on the idea that killing a fetus is wrong. It's about not preemptively ending an unborn child's life and that meaning a woman wouldn't be able to terminate her pregnancy is only a side effect of that. If anything it's based in sympathy. Many pro-lifers are women.
And while woman would get the final say, I think men and anyone who won't get an abortion can still have an opinion on it. I don't see why not, it's ludicrous.
The pro-life movement has many issues but I'm sick of the best of them being demonized and portrayed as the absolute bad-guys with the most loud mouthed toxic shrews of the pro-choice side held up on a pedestal.
I could pick apart everything that's wrong with that text but it exasperates me to no end and won't make a difference. So I'll just say I don't very much care for it.
Bollocks to your bollocks.
As long as men make all the decisions for women, it is nothing more than a male power-trip.
If a woman chooses to carry to full term and deliver, or if she decides to terminate her pregnancy before the foetus become externally viable, then the decision is hers alone -- not yours..
What makes you think that you have such a great amount of privilege that you can assert your will over that of a woman and deny her the right to choose?
Or let me put it another way: If you have such a great amount of privilege over women's bodies, then you might also exercise that privilege to force a woman to conceive, carry, and deliver your baby against her will.
That is called "rape", for your information.
If they had undergone the proper medical procedures by appropriately-trained and licensed medical personnel, they might still be alive.
Sadly, it is fair to point out that the "Right to Life" does not automatically grant the privilege of being wanted.
If pro-lifers truly cared about children there wouldn’t be around 400,000 children in foster care waiting for adoption.
https://www.adoptuskids.org/meet-the-ch ... e-children
Shouldn’t we care for the ones here now instead of forcing women to have children they can’t care for or don’t want?
_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi
Given that, would the author assert that someone who could have been aborted doesn't have a right to have an opinion about abortion?
_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011
Sweetleaf
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a66d/8a66d21872cf8415046fcac62c3c4f85de9d79dd" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,995
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
So anyone who doesn't want kids should remain celibate and never have sex?....that is never going to happen.
_________________
We won't go back.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a66d/8a66d21872cf8415046fcac62c3c4f85de9d79dd" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,995
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Pentagon ends paying for travel for abortion |
31 Jan 2025, 5:39 pm |
New to the forum and the reality of ASD |
02 Jan 2025, 7:01 pm |
Finally managed to join the forum! |
21 Jan 2025, 11:30 pm |
forum post likely to increase polarization |
28 Dec 2024, 12:54 pm |