Joe90 wrote:
It's just that even if you use positive or harmless stereotypes for black people it's still racist.
If movies used a black person to be a snobby rich butler, it would be controversial, even though being rich is a good thing and the butler is being paid, it would still be controversially viewed as slavery.
It's like there is no political correctness when it comes to the British, but we're under serious pressure to be politically correct to most other nationalities, except for Americans and Australians and a couple of other nationalities.
You remember the Fresh Prince of Bel Air, right?
I'm not sure anyone really gives a monkeys any more. Unless you're amazingly rich, butlers of any form simply aren't a thing. It's mostly fantasy.
Nannies and personal assistants are more likely, for old-school money, or maybe having a paid posse if you're a new money star off the street.
Yes there are inequalities in real life and certain people are more likely to be in "helper" roles. Is that stereotyping, if it reflects reality?
Going back to the original point about "English" butlers, there might be several reasons for this.
Firstly, for reasons I still don't fully understand, the English accent is still seen as "classy". Even though the stereotypical, BBC radio announcer, stiff upper lip English accent is actually more of a
lack of accent than anything else. Upper and middle class colonials still aspire to those heights of posh blandness, whether they want to admit it or not.
Secondly, there's the snob value. Anyone with money can afford Mexicans or Africans dahling, but
we employ white people.
Thirdly, there could be an element of American Independence revenge, tinged with a desire for credibility. Money doesn't mean class. Yeah, we own you now, Stephen Fry, Hugh Laurie, Rowan Atkinson. Wash my dishes, and let your unspoken sophistication rub off.
And lastly, as the Yes Minister clip showed, we like playing subtle power games. I get the impression rich Americans enjoy this, they want to join the game and hone their skills. What better way than to emply a butler with a razor-sharp wit?
There's a massive difference between employment through choice, and slavery. There are definitely PAs, secretaries, butlers, bodyguards, nannies, style gurus etc. who do their jobs through choice because they like it, not because they have no other options. It only becomes morally dodgy when we get to the level of wage slavery i.e. doing a job to pay the bills because there's no other job. That's why ethnic minorities are more sensitive to these type of roles - if they're involved, it's normally because they can't afford to say no. Rather than a choice to be a playfully intelligent chap in a posh suit engaging in subtle word games with the boss.