naturalplastic wrote:
Back when aspergers was a seperate diagnosis you had to be 70 IQ or above to be lumped into aspergers. Below that you were in the "other kinds of autism" hopper. But non aspie autistics could also be 70 (slightly subpar) normal, or above normal IQ, as well.
Your comment made me think of people like Temple Grandin who were diagnosed with classic Autism decades ago, but have superior intelligence and earned prestigious degrees. I suppose what you're saying allows for that, but a person who was classified with Aspergers couldn't have a low IQ.
Interesting.
Maybe they do full IQ tests for some people now, to screen for other conditions or problems even though it's not part of the diagnostic criteria?
It's so confusing. Since we all have different experiences with diagnosis, I can only imagine how confusing it is for non-Autistic people to understand what Autism is all about.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles