Page 1 of 1 [ 12 posts ] 

bc1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 140
Location: boise... eventually.

04 Aug 2007, 8:47 pm

this is directed towards the classical musicians and band geeks among us, of course.


i get hardly anything out of watching a conductor. the tempo, obviously, and i know that if he has his hands very far apart, it means play loud, and if they are close together, play quiet. i can see these things out of the corner of my eye while looking at my music, so i see no need to look directly at them (this has gotten me in trouble in school, of course).

i assume that the conductor is conveying all sorts of information about phrasing and such via body language (otherwise, i see no purpose to having one in front of a professional orchestra, the members of which are presumably capable of keeping time by themselves). but i don't get anything like that out of watching.

thoughts? similar experiances?



Litguy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 649
Location: New Jersey

04 Aug 2007, 9:04 pm

The only thing I would add from my band geek days (forty years ago) would be him cuing in the sections at the right time. Of course, most of us would just be sitting them counting beats until it was our turn, but still.... :)



bc1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 140
Location: boise... eventually.

04 Aug 2007, 9:10 pm

i forgot cuing... probably because honestly, i can't see why they do it. i mean, it says when to come in on the part. i think it's an ego thing- it must be very satisfying to wave your arm and get a beatiful sound in response.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

04 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm

I thought the conductor just set the tempo. Depends how many beats to a measure there are in a piece, but when the stylus or stick goes down that's the first beat of the measure or the downbeat. The downbeat is supposed to be accented to set it apart. Like ONE two three four, ONE two three four, if there are four beats to a measure. I've just read a few chapters of a music fundamentals textbook, so that is all I know about one thing a conductor does. There's probably more, but that's all I know.



Litguy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 649
Location: New Jersey

04 Aug 2007, 10:13 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I thought the conductor just set the tempo. Depends how many beats to a measure there are in a piece, but when the stylus or stick goes down that's the first beat of the measure or the downbeat. The downbeat is supposed to be accented to set it apart. Like ONE two three four, ONE two three four, if there are four beats to a measure. I've just read a few chapters of a music fundamentals textbook, so that is all I know about one thing a conductor does. There's probably more, but that's all I know.
There's more, but most of what is communicated should already be done in rehearsal. We're talking about student bands here, but, with professionals the conductor's most important role is really in rehearsal.

There have been a few professional orchestras that were actually led by their concert master (first violinist) and, therfore, performed without a conductor.



UncleBeer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland

05 Aug 2007, 2:11 am

The vasts majority of the time, they're just fleshy metronomes. There are occasions though, where they can shoot an intense look that'll wake a group up and sort of "rally the troops" to a climax.



Asparval
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 847
Location: UK

05 Aug 2007, 3:07 am

bc1 wrote:
this is directed towards the classical musicians and band geeks among us, of course.


i get hardly anything out of watching a conductor. the tempo, obviously, and i know that if he has his hands very far apart, it means play loud, and if they are close together, play quiet. i can see these things out of the corner of my eye while looking at my music, so i see no need to look directly at them (this has gotten me in trouble in school, of course).

i assume that the conductor is conveying all sorts of information about phrasing and such via body language (otherwise, i see no purpose to having one in front of a professional orchestra, the members of which are presumably capable of keeping time by themselves). but i don't get anything like that out of watching.

thoughts? similar experiances?


The role of the conductor only really developed out the need for someone to keep all the musicians playing together.

In Baroque music this was usually done by the harpsichordist in the group.

There isn't really a need for somone to conduct from the front; I think the importance of the conductor has become artificially inflated in the 19th century.



UncleBeer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland

05 Aug 2007, 3:18 am

Asparval wrote:
There isn't really a need for somone to conduct from the front.

I'd disagree. Orchestral music of the Romantic era (think: Mahler, Strauss, Wagner) is chock full of rubato and tempo change. That's when the 'fleshy metronome' comes in handy!

Also, in opera, the conductor serves as liaison between what's going on in the pit and what's going on onstage. Indispensable.



Asparval
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 847
Location: UK

05 Aug 2007, 3:40 am

UncleBeer wrote:
That's when the 'fleshy metronome' comes in handy!


That's funny :lol: :lol: :lol:

Actually I agree about Opera and staged performances in general.



richie
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jan 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 30,142
Location: Lake Whoop-Dee-Doo, Pennsylvania

05 Aug 2007, 11:16 am

UncleBeer wrote:
Asparval wrote:
There isn't really a need for somone to conduct from the front.

I'd disagree. Orchestral music of the Romantic era (think: Mahler, Strauss, Wagner) is chock full of rubato and tempo change. That's when the 'fleshy metronome' comes in handy!

Also, in opera, the conductor serves as liaison between what's going on in the pit and what's going on onstage. Indispensable.


Also Mahler's Second and Eighth symphonies employed offstage ensembles to augment the main orchestra, these
were usually directed by a principal player in the orchestra.



UncleBeer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland

05 Aug 2007, 12:13 pm

richie wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
Asparval wrote:
There isn't really a need for somone to conduct from the front.

I'd disagree. Orchestral music of the Romantic era (think: Mahler, Strauss, Wagner) is chock full of rubato and tempo change. That's when the 'fleshy metronome' comes in handy!

Also, in opera, the conductor serves as liaison between what's going on in the pit and what's going on onstage. Indispensable.

Also Mahler's Second and Eighth symphonies employed offstage ensembles to augment the main orchestra, these were usually directed by a principal player in the orchestra.

Don't know as I'd ever heard that. Nowadays they'll be in the wings with the stage door open a crack, and several of the players will be able to see the conductor.

Not being argumentative for no good reason; I'm a professional orchestral musician. :D



bc1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 140
Location: boise... eventually.

05 Aug 2007, 7:16 pm

what orchestra are you with, and what do you play? i didn't know there were any pro muso's on this board.

i used to play principal clarinet with the local youth symphony in high school. it was loads of fun, but i wouldn't consider it as a career option... i've got the bass clarinet chops to make a low-to-mid-level professional group (or so my teacher claims), but couldn't cut it on Bb/A clarinets, and i wouldn't really enjoy it even if i did, since being an orchestral bc player is about 90% counting rests, 5% Bb , 4% oom-pahs, and 1% fun. :roll:. playing first chair was fun, though, even though the group was terrible.

//

so we've agreed, the primary purpose of a conductor is to run rehearsals, and to indicate tempo changes that might trainwreck if left to the group. which means, basically, that there is no need to do anything but watch through peripherals.