DW_a_mom wrote:
Nuts. Anti-science. Require warning materials or speech if you're flipped out about safety, but banning? Because politicians know so much better than the doctors and scientists? Right. Not.
Woodpecker wrote:
My view is that a group of politicians are not to be trusted to deal with a matter of science in this case.
What neither of you seem to appreciate is that there are plenty of scientists and doctors calling for the mRNA vaccines to be withdrawn too. What's more, a lot of the 'science' you've been told to trust promoting these vaccines (and related measures) over the past three years has been influenced by politics anyway. For example..
- Those scientists and doctors who warned against lockdowns in the first place (e.g., see the Great Barrington Declaration) were ignored.
- Doctors and scientists recommending repurposed and provably safe drugs as treatments for covid were ignored, censored or attacked in the media.
- Doctors and scientists warning against mRNA vaccines from the start were likewise ignored, censored or attacked in the media.
- Most vaccines require about ten years of testing before being rolled out. There had never been any mRNA vaccines approved for use on humans before. Nor had there ever been a successful vaccine of any sort for a coronavirus before. Yet these mRNA covid vaccines were rolled out in a few months.
- Whistleblowers who spoke out about fraud during the clinical trials were ignored.
- Doctors and scientists who spoke about natural immunity from previous infection being the best protection against future infection were ignored, and the covid vaccines were promoted to everyone whether they already had the antibodies or not
- Pfizer admitted their vaccines weren't even tested to see if they stopped transmission, and yet the covid vaccines were still rolled out to children and teenagers who were at hardly any risk from covid itself.
- And now the mRNA vaccines are causing health problems all over the world, most politicians and media are still covering it up.