Tim_Tex wrote:
Look how Obama was treated.
People were hanging effigies of him, Congress was obstructing him at every turn (most notably the Senate nomination of Merrick Garland--yet all three of Trump's appointees would be fast tracked), people were comparing his wife to a "gorilla", even going after his daughters.
And this doesn't even count the belief that he was a Muslim born in Kenya.
Then there's Hillary Clinton:
The whole thing about her e-mails and her handling of Benghazi. Yet male officials in the same situation that HRC was accused of being in were given a full pass.
Trump's "nasty woman" remark. A congressman (who happens to be *my* congressman) defended him, saying "sometimes a lady needs to be told when she's nasty"
You have a point on Obama, but he was the first and at some point there will be more black Presidents, but you act like there isn't a history of some pretty disgusting rhetoric going back to just about the earliest US Presidential elections with candidates being literally accused of eating babies.
As far as HRC goes, she ran purely on the basis of being a woman and chased away those pesky "Bernie Bros" that she wasn't interested in. It was a sexist position to take, but not suprising given that she was the source of the racist "Obama Boys" in 2008 when she lost and she never had popular support even within the Democratic party.
This is all way over-wrought and does nothing to address anything that could be useful going forward. The next few years are going to be very "interesting" as both parties are forced to realign as the status quo has broken to the point where it really doesn't work for 90% of the population.