Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

18 Oct 2007, 4:03 am

http://www.brandweeknrx.com/2007/08/the ... path-.html


I got it wrong. I figured it was the sister's husband or something.



Yog-Sothoth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 873

18 Oct 2007, 5:21 am

Oh s**t . . . I got it right.
Dont keep reading my post if you dont want to know the answer.
I'll put a picture here to separate it.

Image

I thought for a while, I was thinking that she might think her sister would be cometition or something, but how would she be competition for her if she couldnt reach the guy? Then I thought the answer must have had something to do with her mom dying, and then it hit my like a f****n brick, if she killed her sister there would be another funeral and the guy might show up!
I take pride in always being right about everything, but maybe in this case, its not so great?



David1981
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 189
Location: Québec, Canada

18 Oct 2007, 5:47 am

I got it right too. I wouldn't worry much about it, though.

The fact that she killed her sister in order to see the man again is the most logical answer. You see, if she met the man at the mother's funeral, logic suggests the gentleman in question was a family friend. Ergo, by killing another member of her (and vicariously, her mother's) family, the chances were high that said gentleman would reappear, thus giving her a chance to meet him again and receive the information that she didn't receive the first time.

In order for one to be a psychopath, wouldn't one need to commit such an act, or at the least, seriously consider it? Just figuring out the why she did what she did does not make one a psychopath. If this were not the case, wouldn't every police detective be, by extension, a psychopath?



Yog-Sothoth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 873

18 Oct 2007, 5:52 am

David1981 wrote:
I got it right too. I wouldn't worry much about it, though.

The fact that she killed her sister in order to see the man again is the most logical answer. You see, if she met the man at the mother's funeral, logic suggests the gentleman in question was a family friend. Ergo, by killing another member of her (and vicariously, her mother's) family, the chances were high that said gentleman would reappear, thus giving her a chance to meet him again and receive the information that she didn't receive the first time.

In order for one to be a psychopath, wouldn't one need to commit such an act, or at the least, seriously consider it? Just figuring out the why she did what she did does not make one a psychopath. If this were not the case, wouldn't every police detective be, by extension, a psychopath?

Yeah, that would mean like all detectives are insane. If anybody thinks about that long enough, they would eventually find the right answer, and I never give up on riddles and stuff, I always have to figure stuff out, so I woulda figured it out eventually, but I just happen to get it pretty quick cause I'm smart.



One-Winged-Angel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,860
Location: Under your bed, in your closet, in your head

18 Oct 2007, 6:10 am

I took the test a long time ago. I got it right.


_________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.


Coyote27
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 384
Location: Western WA

18 Oct 2007, 6:15 am

Mhahahaha.