I think that this perception of *handouts* being a negative aspect of humanity needs to eradicated and removed from consciousness. In societies there will always be poor people. That's by design! That is so the opporutinity for charity can be established. Otherwise there wouldn't be a need for compassion! To feed another human being is a beautiful thing. It's a holy act. It's being God-like and it sends vibes of love ricocheting in bliss all over the universe. Some poor people know this consciousnessly or unconsciously and surrender their possessions and worldly goods so that this channel of giving remains open. And you know what? There is nothing wrong with it, other than the connotations via commentary offered by people that are *bothered* by the sights and feelings it arouses in them. Isn't that why Xmas was invented? To assuage all guilt from the stingy and cold-hearted bastards of the world? Well, anyway - poor people have to eat 7 days a week, 3 times a day - that's a whole lot of giving opportunity for a whole lot of people.
ouinon wrote:
I can believe that for many homeless who rely on others donations for money for food to eat or on their own searchings in bins etc it is strangely comforting , to be in a position so like that of babyhood, of waiting for someone to give them food ( or the money for food) , the very hunger will be psychologically restful/familiar. It means that they are babies again who can't even get their own food, but are dependent on others. I know that my own experience of being homeless and penniless , and consequently often very hungry , (to point of thinking wouldn't be able to get up from where I'd slept for night on one occasion) dependent on handouts in bakers , or of food from bins , was strangely .....wonderful.
It hadn't occurred to me before ( i had wondered whether weird states were result of eating almost exclusively wheat , old bread, etc in between periods of fasting, and the effect on my gluten intolerance ) but I think it did somehow make me feel safe. Because for many in our culture, despite the movement towards feeding babies on demand etc, our biggest experience of hunger is when baby. Those infinite waits between feeds , of hours . After 9 months in the womb where feeding was constant, through the blood. And when it is known that babies will, if they are free to, suckle every 20 minutes , or 10-15 times a day , the pathetic 4 or 5 or perhaps 6 feeds with which they are supposed to content themselves according to accepted child-care principles, will by definition mean HUNGER. Hunger , and passive waiting, because soon learn that crying doesn't change much .
_________________
Natives who beat drums to drive off evil spirits are objects of scorn to smart Americans who blow horns to break up traffic jams. ~Mary Ellen Kelly