JasonWilkes wrote:
Technically: yes. When talking to the average person, I'd say: no.
Vernacular speech often differs from the specialized mini-languages that develop in certain subcultures or highly specialized academic fields.
For example: The word "Atheist".
In vernacular, everyday speech, most people interpret the word to refer to a person who believes that there is no god (i.e. a belief, or assertion, of a negative), whereas almost every writer, philosopher, etc. who calls him/her self an "Atheist", actually holds closer to the position that the average person would call "Agnostic" -- (i.e. a lack of belief in a god or gods, but not an assertion of either a negative or positive stance).
So while technically, Asperger's is a form of Autism, saying so to anyone who doesn't already know a lot about AS would probably serve more to misinform than to inform.
You are certainly right:
a=without
theist=belief in god
Without belief in god
Unfortunately, many believe that "no belief in god" means "belief of no god".
One thing I ALWAYS hated was:
inflammable! What the HELL does THAT mean!?!? in=not! flammable=able to catch fire! So OBVIOUSLY inflammable doesn't mean able to catch fire because, even if it did, they would STILL say flammable because it is clearer, shorter, etc....
YET, inflammable DOES mean flammable! SO, although I would NEVER say "inflammable"(It is a MORONIC word, it is deceptive and gives you NOTHING that a part of it "flammable" would give you.), I have to recognize what it COULD mean. SOME might use it to mean NON flammable though!
Likewise, atheist has an understood meaning EVEN if it is TRULY incorrect.