Friend zone.. it is one-sided?

Page 1 of 5 [ 70 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

bunny-in-the-moon
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 98
Location: UK

07 Oct 2008, 6:08 am

This is a quote from a popular men's magazine concerning the difficulties men face if they've been thrown into what's known as the "friend zone". I'm hoping you're all familiar with that term and what it entails.

"...It’s infinitely easier for women to place men into the category of “friends” rather than admit them as lovers.

In fact, for a woman, a male friend is the best of both worlds: She can reap all the benefits of having a man around (strength, decision-making, solid advice, logic, common sense, and so on) without the hormone-based entanglements that sex brings to the table.

But men are different. Since we aren’t saddled with psychologically crippling emotions, we aren’t burdened with the senselessness of separating friendship from sex. In fact, for us, it’s just the opposite..."


Is it me being overly-systematic with regards to the fairer sex, or does this basically sum up how us blokes in the friend zone feel ie. used??

I just can't help but feel that what this article is saying and the way I'm treated by the girls I'm friends with states those of us in the friend zone are merely being used and reaping none of the rewards that, putting it bluntly, the a**holes they date, are. Putting up with listening to them go on about how amazing these guys are whilst we're the ones who buy them drinks and deal with the emotional fallout that these alpha males create.

Perhaps I should feel blessed that I've not gone too long without sex or female attention and that if I have, it's usually been because I want it that way. Perhaps I shouldn't feel like being thrown into the friend zone is a slight against me as a man and my looks, personality etc.

And maybe, just maybe, by me asking this question, I've already demonstrated this is all beyond reason and logic, that the problem lies within my view of women and what they're here for :? ?

Reasonable question to ask or am I just a chauvinist pig?



Xanderbeanz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 627

07 Oct 2008, 6:44 am

bunny-in-the-moon wrote:
Since we aren’t saddled with psychologically crippling emotions,


see now that is NOT me at all XD

but yeah, i think your view on females may be slightly bitter and misinformed, many of them love the "whole package" of falling in love as much as males...lol x



bunny-in-the-moon
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 98
Location: UK

07 Oct 2008, 6:54 am

Xanderbeanz wrote:
bunny-in-the-moon wrote:
Since we aren’t saddled with psychologically crippling emotions,


see now that is NOT me at all XD

but yeah, i think your view on females may be slightly bitter and misinformed, many of them love the "whole package" of falling in love as much as males...lol x


I have to agree that I am extremely emotional when it comes to relationships.. it's rare that I cold-heartedly use a woman for sex. But yeah, I do think I have a mistrust of women rooted in many bad experiences. I obviously need to sort it out :( .

Thought it was worth asking though!!



lotusblossom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,994

07 Oct 2008, 4:22 pm

I dont think friendship should be viewed as not giving any benefits and if you dont value someone enough to value their friendship alone then you probably shouldnt have a relationship with them. I expect most women would feel used if a guy thought the only "benefit" he got from her was sex.

maybe guys stay in the friend zone when their attitude does not warrent sexual attention ie, they are a bit of a woman hater and they only want to "use" the woman for sex?

I think women also value sex, so if she doesnt have sex with you its because she doesnt want to and if she wants you as a friend then you should decide if you value her friendship or if you were only interested in her for sex (ie you were the user not her) and go find someone who will have sex with you or you find interesting enough to value her friendship?



bunny-in-the-moon
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 98
Location: UK

07 Oct 2008, 11:35 pm

lotusblossom wrote:
I dont think friendship should be viewed as not giving any benefits and if you dont value someone enough to value their friendship alone then you probably shouldnt have a relationship with them. I expect most women would feel used if a guy thought the only "benefit" he got from her was sex.

maybe guys stay in the friend zone when their attitude does not warrent sexual attention ie, they are a bit of a woman hater and they only want to "use" the woman for sex?

I think women also value sex, so if she doesnt have sex with you its because she doesnt want to and if she wants you as a friend then you should decide if you value her friendship or if you were only interested in her for sex (ie you were the user not her) and go find someone who will have sex with you or you find interesting enough to value her friendship?


I actually have a lot to offer in a sexual relationship that the a**holes my girl-friends date don't. I think you've misinterpreted my original post. They date the woman haters and blokes who are going to use them for sex.

I'm the one whinging because once again the nice guy gets no where. I don't think there is much wrong with doing that.
I didn't actually seriously expect anyone to respond to this post of the opinion that I'm a chauvinist, thought people would have seen the problem for what it is. Nice guys finishing last.



Cyberman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,736
Location: hibernating

08 Oct 2008, 1:30 am

Oh God, not THIS s**t again... :wall:

This idea of the "friend zone"... I think it should be called the "ugliness zone." If you make an advance and the girl says "Let's just be friends," it's just a polite way of saying "I find you ugly." It means she's NOT ATTRACTED TO YOU. PERIOD. And while it doesn't happen very often, there ARE friends who become lovers. So the real barrier is the lack of attraction, not the "friendship."

And as for "nice guys finishing last"... it's an inaccurate generalization. Nice guys will finish last with women who don't like nice guys, but that doesn't mean that ALL women don't like nice guys... if none of them did, I wouldn't even be here.

So if you guys really want to get anywhere, you need to stop repeating these stupid cultural cliches and start looking for alternatives. "Think outside the box." (OK, that's cliche as well, but it's one worth emphasizing here.)



bunny-in-the-moon
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 98
Location: UK

08 Oct 2008, 4:19 am

Cyberman wrote:
Oh God, not THIS sh** again... :wall:

This idea of the "friend zone"... I think it should be called the "ugliness zone." If you make an advance and the girl says "Let's just be friends," it's just a polite way of saying "I find you ugly." It means she's NOT ATTRACTED TO YOU. PERIOD. And while it doesn't happen very often, there ARE friends who become lovers. So the real barrier is the lack of attraction, not the "friendship."

And as for "nice guys finishing last"... it's an inaccurate generalization. Nice guys will finish last with women who don't like nice guys, but that doesn't mean that ALL women don't like nice guys... if none of them did, I wouldn't even be here.

So if you guys really want to get anywhere, you need to stop repeating these stupid cultural cliches and start looking for alternatives. "Think outside the box." (OK, that's cliche as well, but it's one worth emphasizing here.)


Don't you think using the word ugly's a bit harsh?? I can settle for someone not being attracted to me because everyone's attracted to different things.. but I think going as far as to insinuate I'm ugly over this is a little out of order.



pbcoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,892
Location: the City of Palaces

08 Oct 2008, 8:22 am

lotusblossom wrote:
I dont think friendship should be viewed as not giving any benefits and if you dont value someone enough to value their friendship alone then you probably shouldnt have a relationship with them. I expect most women would feel used if a guy thought the only "benefit" he got from her was sex.

maybe guys stay in the friend zone when their attitude does not warrent sexual attention ie, they are a bit of a woman hater and they only want to "use" the woman for sex?

I think women also value sex, so if she doesnt have sex with you its because she doesnt want to and if she wants you as a friend then you should decide if you value her friendship or if you were only interested in her for sex (ie you were the user not her) and go find someone who will have sex with you or you find interesting enough to value her friendship?


The problem is a lot of women, I'd say a large majority though not all, don't value friendship with males, at least heterosexual ones, at all. The guy friend is the one they turn to when they need practical help or to vent, but they go to their girlfriends when they want to have fun. In other words, they use the guy as a shoulder to cry on, as a jar-opener, etc, but their real friends are girls. Such 'friendship' is worthless and in my view it makes 'let's be friends' (when it refers to that kind of 'friendship') more insulting than 'I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.' Men usually detest 'let's be friends' because usually it means either 'I want you out of my life but I don't have the guts to say it' or it refers to the 'friendship' I was describing. Both meanings are insulting if the guy is looking for something more than sex.


_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)

El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)

I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).


Cyberman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,736
Location: hibernating

08 Oct 2008, 11:58 am

bunny-in-the-moon wrote:
Don't you think using the word ugly's a bit harsh?? I can settle for someone not being attracted to me because everyone's attracted to different things.. but I think going as far as to insinuate I'm ugly over this is a little out of order.

OK, maybe "ugly" wasn't the right word... but if a girl says "Let's just be friends," it means that she's just not attracted to you in that way, and probably never will be, so it's time to move on and find another girl who IS attracted to you. Like you said, everyone's attracted to different things.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

08 Oct 2008, 1:18 pm

Cyberman is using ugly to mean any form of non attraction.



Alycat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,690
Location: Birmingham, UK

08 Oct 2008, 1:22 pm

Cyberman wrote:
Oh God, not THIS sh** again... :wall:

This idea of the "friend zone"... I think it should be called the "ugliness zone." If you make an advance and the girl says "Let's just be friends," it's just a polite way of saying "I find you ugly." It means she's NOT ATTRACTED TO YOU. PERIOD. And while it doesn't happen very often, there ARE friends who become lovers. So the real barrier is the lack of attraction, not the "friendship."
Actually I don't think that's true. I have some very good looking guy mates that are just mates. The point is, just because they are a guy and they are good looking, doesn't mean I HAVE to go out with them.
I think it's strange that you are annoyed at girls because they wont go out with you. They have a choice right?


_________________
If you don't believe in dragons it is curiously true, that the dragons you disparage choose to not believe in you.


Cyberman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,736
Location: hibernating

08 Oct 2008, 4:32 pm

Did I even remotely imply that they didn't have a choice? No. And if you need an example of why the "friend zone" concept is horses**t, ask makuranososhi (another member here.)



Last edited by Cyberman on 08 Oct 2008, 4:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Cyberman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,736
Location: hibernating

08 Oct 2008, 4:33 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
Cyberman is using ugly to mean any form of non attraction.
Correct.



Rack
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 149

10 Oct 2008, 1:47 am

It's an important distinction, not just for the ego's of men put in there, but also because women will put good looking men in the friend zone if they aren't sufficiently "alpha".

Still, if I like a girl it means I'd be happy to be friends with her, I may prefer to have a relationship but I want to be with her because I enjoy her company. The only time I feel used is if she says she wants to be friends but makes no emotional connection at all, and only talks to me when she thinks I can be useful.



LePetitPrince
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,464

10 Oct 2008, 3:22 am

Alycat wrote:
Cyberman wrote:
Oh God, not THIS sh** again... :wall:

This idea of the "friend zone"... I think it should be called the "ugliness zone." If you make an advance and the girl says "Let's just be friends," it's just a polite way of saying "I find you ugly." It means she's NOT ATTRACTED TO YOU. PERIOD. And while it doesn't happen very often, there ARE friends who become lovers. So the real barrier is the lack of attraction, not the "friendship."
Actually I don't think that's true. I have some very good looking guy mates that are just mates. The point is, just because they are a guy and they are good looking, doesn't mean I HAVE to go out with them.
I think it's strange that you are annoyed at girls because they wont go out with you. They have a choice right?


Have you ever said to a guy that you find extremely attractive and you drool over him "let's be just friends" while you were single?



LePetitPrince
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,464

10 Oct 2008, 6:10 am

lotusblossom wrote:
I dont think friendship should be viewed as not giving any benefits and if you dont value someone enough to value their friendship alone then you probably shouldnt have a relationship with them. I expect most women would feel used if a guy thought the only "benefit" he got from her was sex.

maybe guys stay in the friend zone when their attitude does not warrent sexual attention ie, they are a bit of a woman hater and they only want to "use" the woman for sex?



Again ...you make it sound as if women can read minds and can know who's sexist and who's not , women are humans and so they don't have a super mind-reading abilities. There are loads of sexist guys who are boyfriends and some are even 'ladies guys'. In fact , most "ladies guys" who are usually attractive and girls drools over them see girls just as sex objects.


Quote:
I think women also value sex, so if she doesnt have sex with you its because she doesnt want to and if she wants you as a friend then you should decide if you value her friendship or if you were only interested in her for sex (ie you were the user not her) and go find someone who will have sex with you or you find interesting enough to value her friendship?


So if someone avoids your friendship because he loves you then that means that he was only interested you in sex? You are mixing the things here....