Post-Punk is a confusing label really. Some post-punk groups intially were punk or new wave groups- Joydivision, Gang Of Four and The Banshees I believe would qualify.
Often the groups are labelled as 'Art Rock', probably because they were similiar to punk groups in some respects but instead of seeing punk as a 'year zero' for music they combined other influences and produced an ecletic mix. Because unlike Punk many of the groups you could not easily put into the same genre as the sound can differ quite drastically.
Groups such as The Human League, The Fall and The Smiths all differ quite abit in their over all sound.
Unlike Punk groups there is a greater degree of diversity are often alot more complex, artistic and displayed more introspective qualities.
Really alot of supposed 'Goth' groups could be considered post-punk.
Quote:
I believe we only need one representitive from that particular genre of music. Thay all are hoaky and lack staying power. We need some really good genuine modern music. We are at an all time low.
We need good music before quirky dresses. If this is truly the age of "fashion-before-music" than we are truly dead
I think while those groups may be similiar in their sound, there still is alot more diversity in it than most genres (like emo). I was only taking the groups which I stated as a representative sample of what seems to cropping-up quite a bit.
Music and fashion since the early twentith century has pretty much became one and both are now practically unseperable. The aesthetic of a group can say much more about them than their sound.
Take Gary Numan, due to his simliarity in image to Billy Idol and David Bowie this hass lead to a large portion of his music to not be correctly considered as authentic. However if he had looked differently then perhaps he would have been taken more seriously.
Quote:
what exactly classifies something as "post-punk"? music that came around after punk was popular? that could be anything.
or is it just popular indie music that you're talking about?
I'm not just talking about the popular end of the spectrum when I say about this whole resurgance. Many groups as I stated just seem to look a little too ordinary and I don't think it's a good indicater of the music they produce.
They either look really understated- liker an office tea boy or rich art student- or over the top pseudo rock 'n' roll image (Towers Of London, The Cribs).
It just depresses me that there doesn't seem to a fun image to lot of independent group nowadays.